Federal Court Guides › FOIA › FOIA for practitioners
Records the government holds

FOIA as case infrastructure, not correspondence

Written for fellow counsel: the difference between firms that use FOIA as an occasional errand and firms that run it as infrastructure shows up in outcomes. Here is the operating pattern — and the courthouse behind it when queues become the obstacle.

Discuss your caseCall (202) 999-3631Direct line to the firm — no intake bots. Email info@dcfederallitigation.com if you prefer to write.

The three practitioner patterns

When the queue is the obstacle: referral or co-counsel

Requests that outlive the statutory clock stop being paperwork problems — constructive exhaustion opens the courthouse, and FOIA litigation converts "in process" into a production schedule. Immigration practices rarely want to run that suit themselves; this firm takes exactly those referrals, in the district where nearly every agency answers, with referral and co-counsel structures that keep your client yours. The same lane serves the delay and denial work upstream of the records.

Questions people actually ask

Do you take FOIA litigation referrals from immigration firms?

Yes — records suits, delay suits and APA challenges are exactly the federal-court work this practice exists for, with the client-ownership terms the referral page spells out.

How long do A-file requests take right now?

Queues move constantly and the honest answer is 'longer than the statute says' — which is why the intake-time request pattern matters, and why the lawsuit exists for files that truly stall.

Can we brand your FOIA work as our firm's?

Court appearances show counsel of record honestly — behind that line, analysis and drafting flow through co-counsel arrangements in the ordinary way. The referral page covers the mechanics.